AB
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp (ADPT)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 revenue was $47.5M (+4% YoY), driven by MRD revenue of $40.1M (+31% YoY), while Immune Medicine declined to $7.3M (-51% YoY) . Net loss per share improved to $(0.23) vs $(0.48) in Q4 2023, and sequencing gross margin reached 59% in Q4 .
- clonoSEQ test volume set a record at 20,945 in Q4 (+34% YoY), with full-year tests at 76,105 (+35% YoY). Medicare’s CLFS Gapfill Determination increased to $2,007/test (+17%), and coverage expanded to Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), strengthening reimbursement and adoption .
- Management guided 2025 MRD revenue to $175–$185M, total OpEx (incl. COGS) to $340–$350M, and cash burn to $60–$70M; expects MRD milestones of $6–$7M and MRD adjusted EBITDA positive in 2H 2025, supported by NovaSeq X margin lift and ASP initiatives .
- Strategic catalysts: ODAC vote endorsing MRD as a primary endpoint in myeloma, NeoGenomics partnership to expand community reach (minimal 2025 volume expected), and accelerated EMR integration (Epic/Flatiron) to standardize workflows and drive volumes .
- Wall Street consensus estimates from S&P Global were not retrievable at this time; comparisons to estimates are therefore unavailable (S&P Global daily limit exceeded).
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- MRD momentum: MRD revenue rose 31% YoY to $40.1M in Q4, with clinical sequencing margin reaching 59% and record clonoSEQ volumes (20,945), reflecting operational leverage and demand expansion .
- Reimbursement tailwinds: “Obtained updated Medicare Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (CLFS) Gapfill Determination for clonoSEQ of $2,007 per test, a 17% increase…”; plus expanded Medicare coverage for MCL and progress contracting commercial/Medicaid payers .
- Strategic positioning: “The ODAC vote in favor of [using] MRD as a primary endpoint… represents a paradigm shift,” aiding pharma milestones and clinical adoption; NeoGenomics partnership to expand community presence (pilot in 2H 2025) .
What Went Wrong
- Immune Medicine headwinds: Q4 Immune Medicine revenue fell 51% YoY to $7.3M, primarily from lower Genentech amortization and fewer pharma/academic services as focus shifts to drug discovery .
- Profitability still out of reach company-wide: Q4 adjusted EBITDA loss was $16.4M (improved vs. $(24.7)M in Q4 2023), and net loss was $33.7M; despite efficiency gains, full-year adjusted EBITDA was $(80.4)M .
- Conservative near-term pharma outlook: 2025 MRD guidance assumes cautious pharma services growth amid industry/regulatory uncertainties; milestones guided at $6–$7M with timing uncertainty .
Financial Results
Quarterly Financials vs. Prior Periods
Notes: Q2 YoY revenue −12%; Q3 YoY +22%; Q4 YoY +4% . Comparisons to consensus estimates unavailable due to S&P Global limit.
Segment Revenue Breakdown
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “2024 was a year of strong execution… Our MRD revenue grew by 42%… and we nominated a lead autoimmune indication within our Immune Medicine business.” — Chad Robins, CEO .
- “We ended the year with a robust cash position of $256 million… We intend to drive top line growth in 2025… increasing ASP to an average of $1,300 per test… becoming adjusted EBITDA positive in the second half of the year.” — Chad Robins .
- “Sequencing gross margin… was 59% for the fourth quarter… Lower overhead costs… and direct labor leverage… contributed to these improvements.” — Kyle Piskel, CFO .
- “Guidance includes conservative MRD pharma services growth… MRD milestones of $6–$7 million… We expect full year operating expenses… $340–$350 million… cash burn… $60–$70 million.” — Kyle Piskel .
Q&A Highlights
- ASP drivers to ~$1,300/test in 2025: full-year impact of Medicare gapfill; recontracting commercial payers; stronger RCM appeals; Medicaid traction, with managed care leveraging gapfill as reference .
- Margin cadence: Q4 sequencing margin at 59%; NovaSeq X expected to add 5–8 ppts in first 12 months, with no material turnaround time impact due to batching capacity and current volumes .
- NeoGenomics partnership: intentional slow ramp; minimal 2025 volume; material impact targeted for 2026–2027; attachment rates mid- to high-single digits over time .
- Volume growth/seasonality: MRD revenue weighted ~40/60 H1/H2; linear volume progression assumed, with potential upside from Epic/Flatiron integration .
- Milestones timing: $6–$7M spread evenly for practical modeling; pharma pipeline/backlog >$200M; ongoing conversions to MRD primary endpoints .
Estimates Context
- We attempted to retrieve S&P Global consensus EPS and revenue estimates for Q4 2024 (and prior two quarters). The feed was unavailable due to a daily request limit exceeded, so consensus comparisons cannot be provided at this time.
- Given the unavailability of S&P Global data, we cannot assess beats/misses versus Street for Q4 2024.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- MRD is the growth engine: accelerating volumes (+34% YoY in Q4), improving margins (59% Q4 sequencing GM%), and expanding reimbursement (Medicare gapfill to $2,007/test, MCL coverage). Execution on ASP and EMR integration is central to 2025 upside .
- Path to MRD profitability in 2H 2025 is credible: NovaSeq X, ASP uplift, and operating leverage should drive margin expansion; monitor cadence of ASP recontracting and volume mix (blood-based/community) .
- Pharma catalysts supportive but prudently guided: $6–$7M milestones embedded with timing uncertainty; ODAC-driven trial design shifts and growing backlog underpin medium-term visibility .
- Immune Medicine remains a drag near-term as revenue amortization declines; R&D is gated with targeted cash burn ($25–$30M), with long-term optionality via in silico TCR and lead autoimmune indication .
- Balance sheet provides runway: $256.0M in cash and marketable securities at year-end supports execution against MRD profitability and IM milestones while managing cash burn to $60–$70M in 2025 .
- Tactical focus: watch ASP progress, EMR integration penetration (>50% by YE 2025), and any earlier-than-expected NeoGenomics ramp; these are key narrative and stock reaction levers .
- Estimates comparison: S&P Global consensus unavailable; reassess beat/miss dynamics upon data access to gauge near-term trading implications.